روما بت
ماه بت
پین باهیس
بهترین سایت شرط بندی
بت کارت
یاس بت
یک بت
مگاپاری
اونجا بت
alvinbet.org
بت برو
بت فا
بت فوروارد
وان ایکس بت
1win giriş
بت وینر
بهترین سایت شرط بندی ایرانی
1xbet giriş
وان کیک بت
وین بت
ریتزو بت
1xbet-ir.com.co/
https://www.symbaloo.com/mix/paperiounblocked2?lang=EN https://www.symbaloo.com/mix/agariounblockedschool1?lang=EN https://yohoho-io.app/ https://2.yohoho-io.net/paper.io unblocked https://www.symbaloo.com/mix/yohoho-unblocked-76?lang=EN https://www.symbaloo.com/mix/agariounblockedpvp https://www.symbaloo.com/mix/yohoho?lang=EN
HomeAnalyticsShould we condemn or not the glorification of Nazism?, by Thierry Meyssan

Should we condemn or not the glorification of Nazism?, by Thierry Meyssan

Published on

Monument to the glory of Stepan Bandera in Ternopil (Ukraine). According to Forward Magazine, there are around a hundred monuments to the glory of Nazi collaborators in Ukraine. Russia demands their immediate destruction, while NATO claims they are unimportant.

At the Liberation (that is to say at the end of the Second World War), Westerners were aware of the suffering caused by the ideologies according to which Humanity was divided into distinct races hierarchically arranged among themselves. Everyone understood that the assertion that these “races” could not mix and have fertile offspring was contradicted by the facts and had only been able to prevail thanks to intense propaganda.

From the creation of the United Nations and throughout the Cold War, the Soviet Union and France ensured that each year the General Assembly adopted a resolution prohibiting Nazi propaganda and the glorification of this ideology. This ritual was forgotten with the dissolution of the USSR. Surprisingly, as of 2020, it has not been possible to reform consensus around this issue. Thus, 53 States opposed the last resolution to this effect, on December 17, 2024, and 10 abstained.

Indeed, if during the World War, the Allies, both American (Canadians, United States), and European (British, French, Greek, Polish, Yugoslavs, Scandinavians, Soviets etc.) were united against a common adversary , this whole was broken, even before the end of the conflict, by an Anglo-Saxon desire (that is to say both certain Americans and certain British) to continue the conflict against the Union Soviet. This is how Alan Dulles, then head of US secret services in Switzerland, and his deputy, Lyman Lemnitzer, negotiated with SS General Karl Wolff in 1945 the surrender of Nazi forces in Italy so that they could fight the Soviets alongside the United States (Operation Sunrise). This separate peace was not implemented because Joseph Stalin immediately opposed it and Franklin D. Roosevelt did not ratify the agreement already reached.

However, Roosevelt, seriously ill, died shortly afterwards, while Dulles became the head of the post-war US secret service, the CIA, and General Lemnitzer became, still later, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff. As a result, the CIA, and to a lesser extent the Department of Defense, became hideouts for former Nazis. Throughout the Cold War, they were placed by the Anglo-Saxons in positions of responsibility in numerous states of the “free world” (sic), from Chile to Iran. They went so far as to create a criminal international group, the World Anti-Communist League, in order to coordinate their efforts against all left-wing movements in the Third World [1].

It was not until 1977, after the revelations of Senator Frank Church’s parliamentary commission on the crimes of the CIA, that President Jimmy Carter and Admiral Stansfield Turner were able to bring order to the CIA and overthrow the dictatorships in Chile. , in Iran and everywhere else.

However, to fight against the Soviet rival, President Ronald Reagan and Prime Minister Magareth Tatcher relied on a new ideology, Islamism, and did not hesitate to develop it, first in Afghanistan, then throughout the Middle East. -East. It was for them the only way to mobilize the Muslim Brotherhood and the Arab people.

Finally, with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, racist movements formerly allied with the Nazis resurfaced. President Bill Clinton and Prime Minister Tony Blair did not hesitate to rely on them. This is how the “integral nationalists” [2], followers of Dmytro Dontsov and Stepan Bandera, came to power in Ukraine.

It all started in January 2005, when, as the country became a member of the European Union, the government, with financial support from the United States Embassy, published a book, History of Latvia: 20th Century. It asserted, among other things, that the Salaspils camp, where the Nazis carried out medical experiments on children and where 90,000 people were murdered, was only a “corrective labor camp” and that the Waffen SS were heros of the fight against the Soviet occupiers. A few months later, it organized a Waffen SS parade in the heart of Riga, as in the previous four years, when it was not a member of the EU [3].

Normally, the entire European Union should have protested. But it didn’t happen. Only Israel and Russia expressed their indignation.

In 2016, the Polish Anna Fotyga, who was then an MEP and would subsequently become director of the Polish presidential administration, then one of the pillars of NATO, presented a resolution in Strasbourg dealing with strategic communications [4]. It was a question of bringing the EU into the Information War against Russia and, in appearance at least, against the Islamists, by establishing a system organized around the NATO Strategic Communication Center [5].

It is in this context that, on September 19, 2019, the European Parliament adopted a resolution “on the importance of European memory for the future of Europe” [6]. This text states that by signing the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the USSR shared the disastrous objectives of the Nazi Reich and started the Second World War. This is obviously completely wrong [7].

Today, the neo-Nazis, the “integral nationalists” [8] can exercise power in Ukraine without raising the slightest objective from the West. We do not notice that their Constitution is the only one in the world to decree, in article 16, that “preserving the genetic heritage of the Ukrainian people is the responsibility of the State” [9]. We do not notice that Volodymyr Zelensky finished his mandate eight months ago and that he illegitimately remains in power without elections. We interpret the ban on opposition political parties and the Orthodox Church [10] as provisions suppressing Russian infiltration. We ignore the purification of libraries [11]. We are just beginning to become aware of the exodus of the Ukrainian population and the mass desertions in their armies.

All this should not surprise us at a time when the same Western authorities explain to us with a smile that the jihadists of Al-Qaeda and Daesh, who have just been put in power in Damascus by the Anglo-Saxons, are only “enlightened Islamists” [12].

Latest articles

Behind the “12-Day War”, by Thierry Meyssan

To date, the only established consequence of operations "The Rising Lion" and "Midnight Hammer" is the questioning of the seriousness and impartiality of the IAEA. The Iranian parliament has just asked its government to cease all cooperation with this organization, which it now considers a spy agency. Several elements of the "12-Day War" remain unexplained,…

Israel – Iran: The Confrontation, by Thierry Meyssan

Here we are: the confrontation between Israel and Persia has begun. Its origins lie not in the Islamic Republic, but in what preceded it. This war is expected to last until one of the adversaries is exhausted. To understand what is happening and avoid falling prey to one of the two official narratives that mask…

Voltaire, International Newsletter N°138

Our director of publication and editor-in-chief directed French magazines several years ago, and has won journalism awards abroad. He has regularly contributed to some fifteen major dailies and magazines around the world. Voltaire, International Newsletter is available by subscription for €500 a year, is published 42 times a year (not in July-August, nor during the…

Zohran Mamdani’s victory: What we know and don’t know

Home » Human needs before profits » Zohran Mamdani’s victory: What we know and don’t know To say that Zohran Mamdani winning the Democratic Party primary for mayor of New York City on June 24 was a complete stunner would be a monumental understatement. He officially beat his opponent, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo,…

More like this

Behind the “12-Day War”, by Thierry Meyssan

To date, the only established consequence of operations "The Rising Lion" and "Midnight Hammer" is the questioning of the seriousness and impartiality of the IAEA. The Iranian parliament has just asked its government to cease all cooperation with this organization, which it now considers a spy agency. Several elements of the "12-Day War" remain unexplained,…

Israel – Iran: The Confrontation, by Thierry Meyssan

Here we are: the confrontation between Israel and Persia has begun. Its origins lie not in the Islamic Republic, but in what preceded it. This war is expected to last until one of the adversaries is exhausted. To understand what is happening and avoid falling prey to one of the two official narratives that mask…

Voltaire, International Newsletter N°138

Our director of publication and editor-in-chief directed French magazines several years ago, and has won journalism awards abroad. He has regularly contributed to some fifteen major dailies and magazines around the world. Voltaire, International Newsletter is available by subscription for €500 a year, is published 42 times a year (not in July-August, nor during the…